The office finds out too late.
A variation raised on site should appear against the affected phase and its cost impact the same morning — not in a monthly report written after the concrete has gone in.
One record, shared by contractors, architects and owners.
A call with the engineers who built it, not a sales pitch.
This is for you if
If none of these are true we are probably not the right call yet, and we will say so.
- A project runs across five tools and none of them agree
- Nobody can say which drawing is current without asking around
- Site still reports to the office on paper and photographs
- Cost position arrives weeks after the work that caused it
What we build for the built environment
Revision control so the current drawing is a fact rather than the outcome of a phone call.
Configured per workflow and completed where the work happens, including poor connectivity.
Captured against the drawing and the location it belongs to, not a phone gallery.
Financial position tracked against the same record as the work, without re-entry.
Contractors, architects, consultants and owners in one project with role-appropriate permissions.
Who approved what, when, against which revision — assembled as work happens.
Four failures that repeat on every project.
Select one for how it is prevented, on site as well as in the office.
Building from a superseded drawing.
The most expensive recurring error on a project, and one no contingency line predicts. Revision control means the current drawing is a fact rather than the outcome of a phone call.
- Single revision-controlled source
- Superseded revisions visibly marked
- Issue and transmittal recorded
- Site sees the same revision as the office
- Notification when a drawing is superseded
- History retained for dispute
The office learns in the monthly report.
By which time the concrete has gone in. Digital forms and photography captured against the drawing close the gap to the same day, including where connectivity on site is poor.
- Forms configured per workflow
- Offline capture, syncing when connectivity returns
- Photos bound to drawing and location
- Variations raised from site immediately
- Cost impact visible the same day
- No re-entry in the office
Commitments and valuations against the work itself.
Financial position tracked on the same record as the work that caused it, so the cost of a variation is visible when it is raised rather than at the next valuation.
- Commitments tracked against the programme
- Variation cost surfaced at the point of raising
- Valuations built from recorded work
- Labour from timesheets, not estimates
- Forecast against actual per phase
- Exportable for your finance system
A shared record only settles arguments if everyone is in it.
Contractors, architects, consultants and owners work in the same project with role-appropriate permissions. A record only one party maintains is that party's version of events.
- Role-based access per organisation
- External parties without licence friction
- Comment and resolution threads retained
- Approval chain visible to all parties
- Jurisdiction-specific configuration
- Neutral record when a claim arrives
Building from a superseded drawing.
The most expensive recurring error on a project, and one no contingency line predicts. Revision control means the current drawing is a fact rather than the outcome of a phone call.
- Single revision-controlled source
- Superseded revisions visibly marked
- Issue and transmittal recorded
- Site sees the same revision as the office
- Notification when a drawing is superseded
- History retained for dispute
Where projects actually lose money.
Rarely in the estimate. Usually in the gap between something changing on site and the people accountable for cost finding out.
The interval between an event and the office knowing — the single most expensive number on a project.
Building from a superseded drawing is a rework cost that no contingency line predicts.
When a claim arrives, the party with the timestamped trail is the one that prevails.
Let's talk about how one project runs today.
The tools it runs across today, and the last time somebody built the wrong thing from a superseded drawing. Walk us through that on a call — nothing has to be sent over for the conversation to be useful.
Construction AI — common questions
Both, and site is the harder half. Forms, drawings and photography are built for use on site including where connectivity is poor, because a system only site staff can't use simply pushes reporting back onto paper and messaging apps.
Yes — contractors, architects, consultants and owners work in the same record with role-appropriate permissions. A shared record only resolves disputes if every party is actually in it.
Aedrix is in production across the UK, UAE and India, where documentation and compliance expectations differ meaningfully. Configuration accounts for that rather than assuming a single regime.