Which drawing is current?
Aedrix puts documents, drawings, digital forms, timesheets and financials into one project record — shared by contractors, architects and owners.
In production across the UK, UAE and India.
Bring a live project and the tools it currently runs across.
This is for you if
If none of these are true we are probably not the right call yet, and we will say so.
- A project runs across five tools and none of them agree
- Nobody can say which drawing is current without asking around
- The site still reports to the office on paper and photographs
- Timesheets and cost position arrive weeks after the work
What a project manager is judged on.
Drawings, documents and approvals in one record, so the current version is a fact rather than the outcome of a phone call.
How long between something happening on site and the office knowing. Digital forms and photography close that gap to the same day.
Who approved what, when, against which revision — assembled as the work happens rather than reconstructed during a dispute.
On a live project
Ask the harder questions.
What actually gets asked once a project is running on it.
Five tools, none of them agreeing.
Most project disputes start as a version problem. Documents, drawings, forms and correspondence sit in one place with revision control, so the current issue is unambiguous and superseded revisions stay retrievable rather than deleted.
- Revision control on every drawing
- Superseded issues retained, clearly marked
- Transmittals recorded with acknowledgement
- One source across office and site
- Search across the whole project record
- Unlimited document storage
Captured where the work is.
Paper forms reach the office days late and already contested. Digital forms are completed on site against the current drawing, timestamped and attributed, so the record exists at the moment the work does.
- Forms configured per workflow
- Completed on site, on a phone or tablet
- Photographs attached to the record
- Timestamped and attributed
- Works with intermittent connectivity
- Timesheets captured the same way
The record you rely on in a claim.
Variations, delays and instructions decide the commercial outcome long after the work is done. Financials sit against the same record as the drawings and forms that justify them, which is what turns a position into a defensible one.
- Variations tracked against instructions
- Costs linked to the supporting record
- Delay evidence assembled from site data
- Valuations from the same source of truth
- Audit trail across the project life
- Exportable for adjudication
Three parties, one project, different views.
Each party needs the same record and a different slice of it. Permissions are set per organisation and per role, so the supply chain participates without seeing commercial detail that is not theirs.
- Per-organisation and per-role permissions
- Supply chain participates without full access
- Owner visibility without operational noise
- Deployed across the UK, UAE and India
- Cloud-hosted, no site infrastructure
- Onboarding measured in days
Five tools, none of them agreeing.
Most project disputes start as a version problem. Documents, drawings, forms and correspondence sit in one place with revision control, so the current issue is unambiguous and superseded revisions stay retrievable rather than deleted.
- Revision control on every drawing
- Superseded issues retained, clearly marked
- Transmittals recorded with acknowledgement
- One source across office and site
- Search across the whole project record
- Unlimited document storage
What Aedrix covers
Unlimited storage with revision control, so the current drawing is unambiguous.
Configured per workflow and completed on site, replacing paper that arrives days later.
Site photographs captured against the drawing and the location they belong to.
Labour recorded where the work happens, feeding cost position without re-entry.
Commitments, valuations and cost tracked against the same record as the work itself.
Contractors, architects, consultants and owners in one project with appropriate permissions.
Who works in it.
A shared record only settles arguments if every party is actually in it.
Field reporting, labour and progress against programme, without duplicate entry.
Drawing issue, revision control and comment resolution in one thread.
Cost position and approvals visible without waiting for a monthly report.
Let's talk about how one project runs today.
The tools it runs across, and the last time somebody built the wrong thing from an old drawing. Talk us through that on a call and the business case usually makes itself.
Aedrix — common questions
Both, and the site is the harder half. Digital forms, drawings and photography are designed for use on site — including where connectivity is poor — so that field-to-office reporting stops depending on paper and messaging apps.
Yes. Contractors, architects, consultants and owners work in the same project record with permissions appropriate to their role, which is the point — a shared record only resolves disputes if every party is actually in it.
Aedrix is in production across the UK, UAE and India, where compliance and documentation expectations differ meaningfully. Configuration accounts for that rather than assuming one regime.
